MODERN HOMO SAPIENS VS HOMO SAPIENS DE FUTURO
Slogan for the MODERN HOMO SAPIENS:
“The world can be whole only when it is divided”
(But it doesn’t matter if you do not understand this)
Slogan for the HOMO SAPIENS DE FUTURO:
“Unity”
Slogan for the MODERN HOMO SAPIENS
“The world can be whole only when it is divided”
(But it doesn’t matter if you do not understand this)
I have ideas about the concept of tolerance that can change the paradigm of relationships between people.
I think it will soon be necessary to take this concept of tolerance into account in forecasting global trends.
The modern problem of relations between people was established hundreds, or even thousands, of years ago, when these relationships began to be tied to the norms of morality (different for different eras and communities).
Up until now, everyone urges each other to respect someone else’s opinion or a different skin color.
But human relations must be transferred to the general laws of Nature, like physical or economic laws, then there will be no need for offensive tolerance.
It’s like the law of gravity. Consider gravity, use it and take off. Nothing more.
“The concept of tolerance (taking a broad-minded view of others’ opinions and beliefs, from the Latin tolerantia, or endurance) was devised by racists and other unenlightened people.
The world is organized in such a way that it requires variety in order to exist, and it is the combination of this variety that creates all the imaginable and unimaginable shades of life.
-The three primary colors — blue, red, and green — when combined produce an array of hundreds of millions of shades.
-The four basic temperaments — choleric, melancholic, sanguine, and phlegmatic — when combined produce the planet’s 7 billion people.
-The different races combine to define what we now call humankind.
-The laws of physics — the law of gravity, the law of conservation of energy — combine to give us the world as we know it and to which we have adapted.
Thus, tolerance is an imprecise and even harmful concept.
See how polite this sounds: “I am tolerant of others’ opinions,” “I am tolerant of others’ skin color,” “I am tolerant of others’ religion.”
But see how stupid this sounds: “I am tolerant of the color blue,” “I am tolerant of the law of gravity.”
Instead of tolerance, the correct word is awareness.
-I am aware that the law of gravity is an integral part of the general laws of nature. I have to adapt to this law in order to survive and grow.
-I am aware that the color blue (and the colors green and red) are an integral part of the color palette. I have to accept this as truth.
-I am aware that other people’s skin color, religion, personality, manners, and ethnicity are an integral part of humankind and its development.
These things will always exist, whether or not I am tolerant of them. I can only choose to be aware of them and accept them as truth.”
This concept can change the paradigm of human relationships. Tolerance is one of the most offensive and ridiculous human inventions. It happens only because it is covered by the laws of morality.
I think that almost all aspects of human relations came from economics or biology.
See how, depending on denomination or skin color, people relate differently to another religion or different mentality. But regardless of denomination or skin color, people treat gravity or earthquakes in much the same way.
One should think that gravity has killed or injured people more than all wars combined. But when a drunk person tries not to fall, he takes gravity into the account. No matter how he relates to gravity, the main thing is that he takes it into the account and adapts. This happens regardless of religion or nationality, and in the same way with earthquakes, people simply tend to build earthquake-resistant structures. When a person takes gravity into the account, he builds technically advanced airplanes and rockets, and takes off.
This is the case when a person says, “I realize that gravity exists and I take it into account in my calculations”, and not when he says “I am tolerant of gravity and will respect it”. It is as funny as to be tolerant or respectful to a blue or red color.
I think that tolerance today is a normal commodity, like any other. It is a whole industry with a good selling product.
Therefore, today tolerance is no longer suitable, we think. A man grew up, but in my opinion, he never matured, because he is still trying to deceive someone with bright beads of tolerance.
Slogan for the HOMO SAPIENS DE FUTURO:
“Unity”
-Bats perceive a range of audio frequencies that is a million times greater than what human beings can hear;
-Dogs have a sense of smell that is a million times more sensitive than a human’s, and they can detect smells at distances beyond the capability of any of our modern technology;
-Birds can see at distances beyond the potential of the human eye;-Reptiles react to the Earth’s geomagnetic and electrical vibrations far sooner than any of our geophysical devices;
-Dolphins create beauty when they leap from the sea;
-Humans have a sacred ability to appreciate the beauty of the world around us, as well as the ability to either magnify it or destroy it
And if, someday, all the living things on Earth are transformed into a single great organism, and this great organism gazes around at the universe and attempts to make sense of it, then it will perceive the world as it truly is, as its creator made it.
Humans must strive to feel that unity. We must strive to see the world just as that great organism — free of shackles or restraints — would see it.
BUT NO ONE WILL EVER SEE THE WORLD AS ITS CREATOR SEES IT
REFERENCES:
https://www.academia.edu/44213832/CONCEPT_OF_TOLERANCE_TIME_FOR_A_CHANGE
https://www.academia.edu/48923187/MODERN_HOMO_SAPIENS_VS_HOMO_SAPIENS_DE_FUTURO
Change the Declaration of Principles on Tolerance (UNESCO, 16 November 1995) http://chng.it/R7nWTByT
